INDEX
EDITORS
SUBSCRIPTION
INFORMATION
SUBMISSION
INFORMATION
&
JSL STYLE SHEET
Return to
HOME
|
|
JSL Vol. 1, No. 1
(Winter-Spring 1993; 1-196)
Articles
-
Leonard Babby. A Theta-Theoretic
Analysis of -en- Suffixation in Russian (3-43)
-
Ronald Feldstein. The Nature
and Use of the Accentual Paradigm as Applied to Russian (44-60)
-
Frank Gladney. R stanovitsja
'stands up' and +i Imperfective Thematization (61-79)
-
Eric P. Hamp. OCS velii-velikyi
and -ok"- (80-82)
-
Marvin Kantor. On the "Desire"
to Hunt (83-91)
-
Margaret Mills. On Russian
and English Pragmalinguistic Requestive Strategies (92-115)
-
Ljiljana Progovac. Locality
and Subject-like Complements in Serbo-Croatian (116-44)
-
Oscar Swan. Notionality, Referentiality,
and the Polish Verb Be (145-66)
-
Adger Williams. The Argument
Structure of sja-Predicates (167-90)
Review
[Herbert Galton]: Boris Hlebec. Aspects, phases
and tenses in English and Serbo-Croatian (191-96)
A Theta-Theoretic
Analysis of -en- Suffixation in Russian
Leonard Babby
No abstract available.
[Journal of Slavic Linguistics 1(1): 3-43,
1993]
The
Nature and Use of the Accentual Paradigm as Applied to Russian
Ronald Feldstein
No abstract available.
[Journal of Slavic Linguistics 1(1): 44-60,
1993]
Russian
stanovitsja
'stands up' and +i Imperfective Thematization
Frank Gladney
Russian stanovitsja 'stands up' is the
-i- imperfective of stanet, not the -sja intransitive
of stanovit. It is like saditsja 'sit down' and lozhitsja
'lie down', which are likewise -i- imperfectives (cf. sjadet,
ljazhet),
not, as the accent shows (cf. sadit, -lozhit), -sja
intransitives. With stanet, stanovitsja shares thematic -n-,
which conditions thematic -ov- as it does in
ischeznovenie,
dunovenie,
etc. Although thematic -i- has imperfectivizing force in the prefixed
imperfectives nosit, -vodit, -vozit, and -xodit,
it does not have it with prefixed -stanovit. Hence in prefixed use
sta- has tended to replace -nov- with productive thematizations.
[Journal of Slavic Linguistics 1(1): 61-79,
1993]
OCS velii-velikyi
and -ok"
Eric P. Hamp
Building on Mares's demonstration that velii
and velikyi are equally old and differ as +/-definite, *-ko-
is thus seen to be semantically empty, i.e. the element I have identified
in ú-stem adjectives and jabl"ko. This *-ko-
with an alternant *-Hko- is then equated with IE *-H{o}k{^w}o-
(BSLP 68, 77-92, 1973) 'facing, appearing', and this equation then
explains the suffix of adjectives of extent such as vysòk",
shiròk".
A new etymology of Albanian plak 'old man', with a different *-ko-,
is given.
-
Dept. of Linguistics, University of Chicago, 1010
E. 59th St., Chicago, IL 60637
[Note: HTML text cannot yet adequately convey
the diacritics required for this sort of linguistic text. In this abstract,
back jer is rendered as ", hacek by addition of "h" (as in Library of Congress
transliteration), a plus/minus sign by +/-; subscripts are enclosed in
{} brackets, and superscripts are enclosed in the same {} brackets, but
with an additional ^.]
[Journal of Slavic Linguistics 1(1): 80-82,
1993]
On the
"Desire" to Hunt
Marvin Kantor
No abstract available.
[Journal of Slavic Linguistics 1(1): 83-91,
1993]
On Russian
and English Pragmalinguistic Requestive Strategies
Margaret Mills
No abstract available.
-
Russian Dept., 681 Phillips Hall, University of Iowa,
Iowa City, IA 52245
[Journal of Slavic Linguistics 1(1): 92-115,
1993]
Locality
and Subjective-Like Complements in Serbo-Croatian
Ljiljana Progovac
Verbs in Serbo-Croatian fall into two basic classes:
those which select opaque complements (henceforth I-verbs, or Indicative-selecting
verbs), and those which select transparent complements, allowing for domain
extension (henceforth S-verbs, selecting Subjunctive-like complements).
I-verbs are mostly verbs of saying and believing, whereas S-verbs are mainly
verbs of wishing or requesting. The following dependencies are clause-bound
with I-verbs, but can cross clause boundaries with S-verbs: lincensing
of Negative Polarity Items, clitic climbing, and topic preposing. In addition,
wh-movement in questions and relative clauses uses different strategies
with I- and S-verbs.
The transparency of S-verbs correlates closely
with their inability to select independent (uncontrolled) tense in their
complements. I will propose that S-verbs allow domain extension by virtue
of licensing deletion of Infl and Comp material in their comp lements at
the level of Logical Form (LF). Such deletion will be possible with S-verbs,
whose complements have recoverable Tense features, but not with I-verbs,
whose complements host independent Tense. I will assume that the same mechanism
can explain do main extension with subjunctive clauses in general.
[Journal of Slavic Linguistics 1(1): 116-44,
1993]
Notionality,
Referentiality, and the Polish Verb 'Be'
Oscar Swan
No abstract available.
[Journal of Slavic Linguistics 1(1): 145-66,
1993]
The
Argument Structure of sja-Predicates
Adger Williams
No abstract available.
[Journal of Slavic Linguistics 1(1): 167-90,
1993] |